One of my biggest quirks, is that when I return home after having a few drinks I always tune into a documentary. Over the years they have ranged from topics included socialism, communism, philosophic deconstruction of Hegel, photography, fonts, light pollution, human rights abuses in numerous places, meth, crack, cocaine, and cults. Ever since I was a child I have had an obscure fascination with cults and religious sects. This not because I wanted to join one, but I found the human desire to join such a dogmatic and cut-off community to be very enthralling to my imagination. How does one choose to cut themselves off from the rest of society, and is there any objectivity left in the human intellect when that decision is made?
Weird right? Completely worth analyzing. Obviously, I have always had a curiosity for the off-beat.
I only mention this because I have just finished this
Cults Documentary today. Normally, most of the documentaries that I have seen around the subject use a lot of speech that demonizes all aspects of the cults, and makes membership seem like a decision that any normal person would/could never make. However, this film gives some neutral perspective (although limited, and contains very strong language and judgements in matters where it cannot be judged for certain whether that is the case or not), which makes cults more understandable and makes them less alien.
For instance, the Peoples Temple Agricultural Project, or Jonestown cult, which originally formed in Indianapolis, Indiana, then moved to San Francisco, California, and then later to Guyana was initiated and maintained on the principle of equality, racial, gender, and economic. Many, if not most, of the members where devoted to the calling of equality and working for the social good of all man. In fact, most were unaware of the the future that Jim Jones would bring upon them.
Quite frankly, it seems like an idealistic community gone astray because of one, or a few, misguided desires of man.
In effect, Jim Jones also had a pristine record before the move to Guyana. Can we say for sure that his motives were always selfish? If a change in the overall principle for the People's Temple occurred after its creation, when was this?
The members are now victims, but I think it is a perverse notion to think all members of cults are/were enslaved by a psychopathic drive to believe in a doctrine proposing a purpose to life. Perhaps they were just regular people looking for an alternative to how the mainstream was working and were unfortunate to fall under the leadership of someone who was , or became, too absorbed in a power complex to be able to think rationally.